Page 57 - SRPSKO DRUŠTVO ISTRAŽIVAČA RAKA
P. 57

SDIRSACR                                                                                 Oncology Insights

        high-intensity pulses capable of delivering FLASH-relevant dose rates per pulse at clinically relevant energies. Very
        High Energy Electron (VHEE) beams generated by laser-driven accelerators further extend this paradigm. VHEEs—in
        the range of 100–250 MeV—combine deep penetration with precise focusing, potentially enabling conformal dose
        distributions even in deep-seated tumors. Laser-driven proton beams represent another frontier. Proton therapy’s
        hallmark Bragg peak enables maximal tumor dose deposition with sharp distal fall-off, but conventional cyclotrons and
        synchrotrons are large and costly. Laser-plasma acceleration may yield compact, cost-effective proton sources capable
        of UHDR delivery, marrying the spatial selectivity of protons with FLASH sparing.


        4. Clinical Integration and Future Directions
        Realizing the promise of these novel modalities demands rigorous translational pathways encompassing dosimetric
        validation, preclinical mechanistic studies, and carefully designed clinical trials. Technological hurdles—such as beam
        stability, real-time dosimetry at UHDRs, and synchronization with immunotherapeutic dosing—must be addressed.
        Concurrently, the development of robust biomarkers for normal tissue response and immune activation will guide
        patient selection and adaptive treatment strategies. Furthermore, computational modeling and artificial intelligence
        will  play  pivotal  roles  in  optimizing  multi  modality  schedules,  predicting  toxicity,  and  personalizing  combination
        regimens.
        In conclusion, the integration of chemotherapy synergistic approaches, hypofractionated high-dose radiation with
        immunotherapy,  and  laser-based  particle  acceleration  technologies  heralds  a  new  era  in  radiation  oncology.  By
        capitalizing on both physical and biological synergies, these strategies strive to overcome the current therapeutic
        plateau—offering potent tumor control, diminished radiation damage, and improved patient outcomes.

        Acknowledgments and funding: The ELI ALPS project (GINOP-2.3.6-15-2015-00001) is supported by the European
        Union and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund.






        L03
        Benefits of combination therapies in the treatment of hematological malignancies


        Zorica Cvetković 1,2

        1  Department of Hematology, Clinic for Internal medicine, University Hospital Medical CenterZemun, Belgrade, Serbia
        2  Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia


        Keywords: hematological malignancies, combination therapy, targeted therapy, benefits

        Hematological malignancies, including acute leukemias, and mature lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms, are inherently
        systemic, involving the bone marrow, blood, and lymphatic tissues from disease onset. Unlike solid tumors, they are not
        amenable to curative local therapies. Surgery is typically limited to diagnostic procedures or emergency management
        of  complications  (e.g.,  organ  rupture,  spinal  cord  compression).  At  the  same  time,  radiotherapy  is  reserved  for
        specific indications, including central nervous system (CNS) involvement in high-risk acute leukemia (AL) or aggressive
        lymphomas,  as  well  as  early-stage  indolent  lymphomas,  though  it  remains  adjunctive.  Consequently,  treatment
        relies almost exclusively on systemic therapies. The management of hematological malignancies represents one of
        the most rapidly evolving fields in medical oncology. These cancers arise in blood-forming and lymphoid tissues and
        involve immune system cells, making them particularly responsive to therapies with cytotoxic and immunomodulatory
        mechanisms. Over the past century, treatment has progressed from single-agent chemotherapy to rationally designed
        combination regimens that incorporate chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies, including bispecific
        antibodies  and  CAR  T-cell  therapy,  as  well  as  epigenetic  modulators.  This  multifaceted  approach  has  significantly
        improved response depth and durability, extended survival, and enhanced quality of life, while reducing treatment-
        related toxicity and long-term morbidity.
        Historical perspective and the emergence of combination chemotherapy in hematological malignancies
        The origins of chemotherapy lie in observations during the early World War II period, that exposure to mustard gas
        caused profound lymphoid suppression. This insight was translated into the first clinical use of alkylating agents to
        treat lymphoma, specifically with the drug mechlorethamine in 1942. The initial successes of these cytotoxic agents,
        which damage DNA to kill rapidly dividing cells, were limited by the rapid emergence of resistant cancer clones. This
        limitation spurred the development of combination chemotherapy in the 1950s and 1960s. By using agents with


    42
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62