Page 94 - SRPSKO DRUŠTVO ISTRAŽIVAČA RAKA
P. 94

Serbian Association for Cancer Research                                                       SDIRSACR

        tumors, maintaining close molecular, morphological, and immunohistochemical similarity to human cancers [3]. They
        faithfully reproduce the microenvironment and cellular heterogeneity found in clinical settings, allowing the tumor
        structure and behavior to remain stable across several generations of host animals. Moreover, PDTX models mirror
        tumor metabolism and vascularization, accurately reflecting nutrient flow and drug distribution as it occurs in patients.
        Importantly, these models retain functional activity: the tumor cells remain viable and biologically active through
        serial transplantation, enabling long-term study of tumor dynamics and drug interactions.In addition to preserving
        tumor integrity, PDTX models provide valuable advantages in the development of cancer therapies. These models
        offer a more dependable platform for in vivo drug testing, increasing the likelihood that preclinical findings align with
        clinical  outcomes.  Critically,  PDTX-derived  organoids  (PDTOs)  [4]  enhance  the  predictability  of  clinical  therapeutic
        response in a quick, cost-effective way, contributing to enhanced decision-making in personalized medicine. PDTX
        models represent a transformative advance in preclinical oncology, offering a more accurate and clinically predictive
        framework  for  the  development  and  evaluation  of  cancer  therapies,  enabling  a  shift  from  simplified  cell-based
        assays to biologically complex, patient-mimicking systems [5]. Their application in drug efficacy testing, biomarker
        validation, resistance mechanism studies, and co-clinical trial design is crucial in reliable cancer therapy development.
        Vascularization and tumor stroma are preserved, making PDTX a vital platform to test modalities that do not directly
        target cancer cells but  instead kill  tumors via tumor microenvironment (TME)  alteration.  Furthermore, they have
        application for in-detail genomic analysis of tumor stages: size-dependent, metastasis vs. primary tumor effects, drug
        naïve vs. treated vs. resistant, etc. On the other hand there are limitations to using PDTX models [3]. Antibodies and
        immunotherapies cannot be properly tested with this technology, while murine antibodies can be tested in allografts
        or Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) or short-term in humanized mice. Lack of a human immune system:
        PDTXs are typically implanted into immunodeficient mice to avoid rejection, but this prevents accurate modeling of
        immune responses, making them unsuitable for studying immunotherapies. Engraftment bias: not all patient tumors
        successfully engraft, where fast-growing, aggressive tumors are more likely to take hold, potentially skewing research
        away from slower-growing but clinically relevant cancers. Loss of stromal components: human stromal and immune
        cells in the tumor microenvironment are gradually replaced by murine cells, which can alter tumor–host interactions
        and drug responses over time. Routine use of PDTX banking in clinical centers is urgent but complex, time-consuming,
        and costly, requiring cooperation of surgical, pathological, administrative (patient consent) and research teams/animal
        house/biobank.
        Results: Our lab develops patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) models that preserve tumor heterogeneity and
        microenvironmental complexity, offering a highly predictive platform for studying therapeutic responses. By sourcing
        samples from numerous cancer types, we have established a diverse and well-documented PDTX model collection,
        including  rare  malignancies  and  metastatic  lesions.  These  models  support  both  basic  and  translational  research
        by  mimicking  clinically  relevant  tumor  behavior  in  vivo.Our  biobanked  PDTX  models  are  serially  xenografted  in
        immunodeficient mice and are accompanied by complete histological and molecular documentation. Additionally, we
        establish PDTX-derived cell line cultures (PDTC) or organoids (PDTO) to compare in vitro and in vivo tumor behavior,
        enhancing our understanding of model fidelity and tumor dynamics, and effectively prescreening and extensively
        study possible drug effects. As part of our research activity, within a wide range of PDTX models from different tissue
        origins and molecular signature, we have developed a vemurafenib-resistant PDTX model from a BRAF V600E-mutant
        melanoma patient [6]. This model, characterized both molecularly and morphologically, was subjected to long-term
        BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib treatment, resulting in an in vivo therapy-resistant phenotype. Bulk mRNA sequencing
        analysis  did  not  align  with  previously  described  resistance  mechanisms,  prompting  further  investigation  of  novel,
        differentially expressed genes. Notably, in this model we also found the role of the ABCB1 multidrug transporter, a
        rarely studied factor in melanoma, which may contribute to drug efflux and therapeutic resistance, given vemurafenib
        is its substrate and can be expelled from ABCB1-positive cells. Furthermore, the same model was successfully used to
        identify potentially druggable metabolic changes affecting cysteine metabolism during the evolution of resistance to
        dabrafenib-trametinib dual treated melanoma [7]. PDTX platform enables the discovery of resistance-driving pathways
        and facilitates preclinical testing of next-generation therapies. By focusing on complex and underrepresented tumor
        models, we aim to accelerate the development of personalized cancer treatments and support metastasis-targeted
        drug discovery by collecting multiple samples and establishing multiple PDTXs from the same patient’s primary and
        disseminated tumor sites.
        Conclusion: PDTX models serve as a critical bridge between basic research and clinical application by preserving tumor
        heterogeneity, microenvironment, and drug response profiles. They offer a more accurate and predictive platform
        than traditional models, supporting drug development, resistance mechanism discovery, and personalized therapy
        design. Despite certain limitations, their integration into translational research enhances the ability to model real-
        world tumor behavior and identify more effective cancer treatments. PDTX models are reshaping the approach to
        precision oncology and accelerating the path from bench to bedside.




                                                                                                                   79
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99