Page 49 - SRPSKO DRUŠTVO ISTRAŽIVAČA RAKA

SDIRSACR Oncology Insights

reviewers; give linguistic support, and a brief guide on how to improve manuscript (12). The authors also suggest
that human involvement in the review process should not be underestimated because AI-based tools rely exclusively
on available data, which may be unrepresentative, or low-scientific-quality, and biased if trained on similar content.
Scientists can easily observe these issues and critically analyze the particular situation. The discussion between
reviewers and involvement of a person in the reviewing process is crucial because that is how new ideas emerge and
how the manuscript quality is significantly improved (12).

Conclusion
An effective and good-quality article should contain an attractive topic, clearly targeted issues in the field, critically
analyzed previous research, and a well-organized structure. A good review article should be written in an appropriate
scientific manner to attract readers to read further. Effective review articles significantly increase the visibility of
the researcher’s work and impact on the scientific and broader public. The number of published review articles per
researcher tends to increase with time spent in science, and it is always better to balance them with original research
performed or published, which is based on experimental work. If balanced with and based on previous researchers’
work, then the strength of the review is higher, as well as the researchers’ relevance and competence in the field, and
the quality of the review is usually higher. The extensive literature survey results in knowledge expansion and new
ideas for future scientific work of junior and senior scientists, as well.

Acknowledgements and Funding
This review was supported by and represents one of the results of the Horizon Europe RadExIORSBoost Project
(HORIZON-WIDERA 2023-ACCESS 02, European Commission, Agreement No. 101158832) and by the Ministry of
Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, by Grant No. 451-03-136/2025-03/
200017 within the Theme No. 0802403 and by Grant No. 451-03-136/2025-03/ 200043. Views and opinions expressed
are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European
Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Contribution
Conceptualization, manuscript and figure design, article writing, editing, and review-Nina Petrović.

References

1. Bonczar M, Ostrowski P, D’Antoni AV, Tubbs RS, Iwanaga J, Ghosh SK, Klejbor I, Kuniewicz M, Walocha J, Moryś J,
Koziej M. How to write an umbrella review? A step-by-step tutorial with tips and tricks. Folia Morphol (Warsz).
2023;82(1):1-6. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2022.0104. Epub 2022 Dec 27. PMID: 36573368.

2. Catherine M Ketcham, James M Crawford, The impact of review articles, Laboratory Investigation,Volume 87, Issue
12, 2007, Pages 1174-1185, ISSN 0023-6837, https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700688.

3. Erol A. Basics of Writing Review Articles. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2022 Jan 13;59(1):1-2. doi: 10.29399/npa.28093. PMID:
35317503; PMCID: PMC8895806.

4. Sukhera J. Narrative Reviews: Flexible, Rigorous, and Practical. J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Aug;14(4):414-417. doi:
10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1. PMID: 35991099; PMCID: PMC9380636.

5. Brignardello-Petersen R, Santesso N, Guyatt GH. Systematic reviews of the literature: an introduction to current
methods. Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Feb 5;194(2):536-542. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae232. PMID: 39038802; PMCID:
PMC11815505.

6. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, McKenzie JE, Veroniki AA (editors). Chapter 10: Chapter 10: Analysing data and
undertaking meta-analyses [last updated November 2024]. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li
T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.5. Cochrane,
2024.

7. Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews:
methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc.
2015 Sep;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055. PMID: 26360830.

8. Yaylali IE, Alaçam T. Critical Assessment of Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews in Endodontics. J Endod. 2016

34