Page 75 - SDIR5 Abstract book 21 12 2021.
P. 75

POSTER PRESENTATIONS



               P35



                               Organ preservation approach for distant located rectal cancer

                                   1
                                                           1,2
                                                                                                   3
                                                                                  3
                  Mladen Marinković , Suzana Stojanović-Rundić ,Aleksandra Stefanović , Radmila Janković , Milena
                                                                3
                                                            Čavić
                  1 Clinic for Radiation Oncology and Diagnostics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute for Oncology and
                                               Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
                                     2  Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
                           3  Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia

               Background:  Standard  treatment  for  locally  advanced  rectal  carcinoma  (LARC)  is  neoadjuvant
               chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery. Complete clinical (cCR) or pathologic response is registered
               in up to 30% of patients, using standard fractionation and total dose (TD) of 45-50.4 Gy. The aim of this
               study was to evaluate the optimal time for assessment of response in order to identify candidates for watch
               and wait approach (WW). Patients and Methods: Patients with LARC were treated with long-course CRT.
               Radiotherapy  was  delivered  using  new  approach,  volumetric  modulated  arc  therapy-simultaneous
               integrated boost with TD of 54 Gy. Concomitant chemotherapy (5FU, Leucovorine) was given during first
               and  fifth  week  of  RT.  Tumor  response  was  assessed  in  eighth  week  after  CRT  with  MRI  scan  and
               proctoscopy. Patients with cCR (mrTRG1)/near cCR (mrTRG2) and distant located tumor were suggested
               no immediate radical surgery, and were enrolled in WW with the aim of sphincter preservation. Results:
               Between June 2020 and January 2021 thirty patients were included. cCR/near cCR according to
               MRI was detected in 37% of patients. Four patients were enrolled in WW. In three of them, control
               MRI was categorized as near cCR in combination with negative proctoscopy examination. In these
               patients we postponed surgery longer and did one more MRI 4 weeks after, which was categorized
               as  mrTRG1.  Conclusion:  For  patients  with  distant  located  tumors  with  cCR  after  CRT,  where
               sphincter preservation isn’t optional, WW would be beneficial. Further studies with identification
               of prognostic biomarkers could be crucial to identify the best candidates for WW.
               Keywords: chemoradiotherapy, complete clinical response, rectal carcinoma.
               Acknowledgements: This study is supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of
               Serbia  (Agreement  No.  451-03-9/2021-14/200043).  This  article  is  based  upon  work  from  COST  Action
               CA17118, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and  Technology); www.cost.eu. MC is
               supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia (PROMIS TRACEPIGEN project No. 6060876).








                                                             62
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80